Commons:Quality images candidates
These are the candidates for becoming quality images. Please note that this is not the same thing as featured pictures. Additionally, if you just want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at Commons:Photography critiques.
Purpose[edit]
The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.
Guidelines[edit]
All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.
For nominators[edit]
Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.
Image page requirements[edit]
- Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
- Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
- Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
- No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.
Creator[edit]
Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.
Technical requirements[edit]
More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.
Resolution[edit]
Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.
Image quality[edit]
Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.
Composition and lighting[edit]
The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.
Value[edit]
Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.
How to nominate[edit]
Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ |}}
The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}
Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.
Number of nominations[edit]
No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.
Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.
Evaluating images[edit]
When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.
How to review[edit]
Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.
- If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}
to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.
- If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}
to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.
Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.
Grace period and promotion[edit]
If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.
How to execute decision[edit]
QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.
If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.
If promoted,
- Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
- Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
- Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 2022.
- Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.
If declined,
- move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 2022.
- Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
- Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
- Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red
Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)[edit]
Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 19 2022 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.
Consensual review process[edit]
Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.
How to ask for consensual review[edit]
To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.
Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.
Consensual review rules[edit]
See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules
Page refresh: purge this page's cache
Nominations[edit]
Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:
--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 16:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
- Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
- Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
- If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms
March 19, 2022[edit]
- Nomination: Himalayan range as visible from Nainital, India --Subhrajyoti07 16:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Front facade and right side, Dutch Church, Kollam, Kerala --Tagooty 15:26, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Front facade, Dutch Church, Kollam, Kerala, --Tagooty 15:26, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Datura metel near Bahadurgarh, Patiala district, India. --Satdeep Gill 14:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Datura metel near Bahadurgarh, Patiala district, India. --Satdeep Gill 14:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Datura metel near Bahadurgarh, Patiala district, India. --Satdeep Gill 14:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Apis mellifera on Salix caprea male inflorescence, Czechia --Nefronus 13:45, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Building on Suzhou Street in the new Summer Palace in Beijing --Ermell 09:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Building on Suzhou Street in the new Summer Palace in Beijing --Ermell 09:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Building on Suzhou Street in the new Summer Palace in Beijing --Ermell 09:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Bridge to Suzhou Street in the new Summer Palace in Beijing --Ermell 09:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Passenger ferry on Kunming Lake at the Summer Palace in Beijing --Ermell 09:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Trunc of an old olive tree in Lun, Croatia. --Palauenc05 08:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 10:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Trunc of an old olive tree in Lun, Croatia. --Palauenc05 08:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 10:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: South portal of Mosteiro dos Jerónimos / Belém, Portugal --Imehling 07:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Torre de Belém / Portugal - Backside --Imehling 07:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:47, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Lone tree in grassy highlands, Idukki, Kerala, India --Tagooty 06:10, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, but in this case I would prefer the tree much more in the right part --Michielverbeek 07:50, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
@Michielverbeek: Thanks for the support and the comment. I've uploaded a new crop with the tree moved to the right. Is this better? --Tagooty 08:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: CSE & IT Depts in foreground, ECE & EEE Depts behind, GEC, Idukki, Kerala --Tagooty 06:10, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Side portal (Bernhard Kleinhans, 1976) of the Überwasserkirche in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination City model of the old town of the city of Münster, which was destroyed in World War II, at the Überwasserkirche in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Detail shot (humpback whale throat furrows) of art project “The Cast Whale Project” (Gil Shachar) in the Holy Cross Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Ferme de la Goudalie in commune of Rodelle, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:41, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Michael church of Montredon, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 05:41, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Saint Leonard church in Escamps, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 05:41, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Saint Peter in chains church in Vaylats, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 05:41, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Tour Ronde in Cardaillac, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 05:41, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Kampen, Church of Our Lady (Outside Church). Church tower.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 19 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:42, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Kampen, Church of Our Lady (Outside Church). Church tower.
- Nomination: Ming Dingling mausoleum, where the Wanli emperor, together with his two empresses Wang Xijie and Dowager Xiaojing was buried. --Charlie fong 04:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Workers' house of Parkhotel on Elisabethstrasse #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Workers' house of Parkhotel on Elisabethstrasse #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:42, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Corporate signboard at the Parkhotel on Hans-Pruscha-Weg #5, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Windows of the villa on Alfredweg #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Dormer window at villa Johanna on Wahlißstraße #11, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Photographed in Purba Medinipur, West Bengal. By User:Gangulybiswarup --Mathieu Kappler 02:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Photographed in West Bengal. By User:Gangulybiswarup --Mathieu Kappler 02:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Photographed in Purba Medinipur, West Bengal. By User:Gangulybiswarup --Mathieu Kappler 02:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Photographed in Purba Medinipur. By User:Gangulybiswarup --Mathieu Kappler 02:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Photographed in Purba Medinipur. By User:Gangulybiswarup --Mathieu Kappler 02:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Congregation Beth Shalom, a Reform synagogue on First Street in Marysville, California. --Frank Schulenburg 02:45, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Ján Novota, Goalkeeper of SK Rapid Wien. --Steindy 00:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 02:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Ján Novota, Goalkeeper of SK Rapid Wien. --Steindy 00:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:45, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Mario Sonnleitner, player of SK Rapid Wien. --Steindy 00:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Mario Sonnleitner, player of SK Rapid Wien. --Steindy 00:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Christopher Dibon (left) and Mario Sonnleitner (right), players of SK Rapid Wien. --Steindy 00:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
March 18, 2022[edit]
- Nomination: Building at 19 rue de l'Embergue in Rodez, Aveyron, France. By [User:Tournasol7]]--Ezarate 23:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: dr hab. Agnieszka Wacławik, professor of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Olsztyn, Department of Hormone Action Mechanisms. Photo taken during the study of molecular processes during the diagnosis and development of pregnancy in mammals (study of the mechanisms involved in the development of the embryo and placenta at the molecular level). By User:Radek Dąbrowski --Mike Peel 22:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Students of geology describing a limestone coresample in Estonian geologycal survey base in Arbavere. By User:Peeterpaaver --Mike Peel 22:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination External measurements in early light. By User:ETH-Bibliothek --Mike Peel 22:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline Certainly VI, but the quality doesn't reach the QI bar. Furthermore the author Fritz Brandenberger is not a Wikimedian. --Milseburg 11:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: FMN Laboratory researcher. By User:FMNLab --Mike Peel 22:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Scientists of the Institute of Hydrobiology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. By User:Bilousolena --Mike Peel 22:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Hôtel Coislin Paris (by Chabe01) --Sebring12Hrs 19:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Hôtel Coislin Paris (by Chabe01) --Sebring12Hrs 19:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Galerie Vivienne (by David Pendery) --Sebring12Hrs 19:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Malibu wakeboard boat at Interboot 2020, Friedrichshafen --MB-one 19:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Eurocopter Ecureuil of Armee de l'Air at Paris Air Show 2019 --MB-one 19:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Skyleader GP One at AERO Friedrichshafen 2018 --MB-one 19:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
why crop the wings and include so much floor? --Charlesjsharp 20:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Done new crop --MB-one 06:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Duty free area at Istanbul Airport seen from the vestibule --MB-one 19:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Petra-Zoranića-Square in Zadar, Croatia. --Palauenc05 18:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 19:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Opel Insignia Sports Tourer. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Man in a street café in Palma
--F. Riedelio 16:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:27, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Man in a street café in Palma
- Nomination Beach chairs on the main beach of Sellin
--F. Riedelio 16:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:27, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Beach chairs on the main beach of Sellin
- Nomination Wing planform with wingtip device of an Airbus A320-200
--F. Riedelio 16:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 16:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Wing planform with wingtip device of an Airbus A320-200
- Nomination Eye drops after a cataract surgery
--F. Riedelio 16:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Eye drops after a cataract surgery
- Nomination Farm at the Freibergsee
--F. Riedelio 16:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Farm at the Freibergsee
- Nomination An electric vehicle power station in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:15, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Carrots on the market at Granville Island, Vancouver, --Christof46 16:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality, look quite edible. Wutsje 22:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination The Eichendorff school in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:53, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Stables of Deir-gachin Caravanserai, Qom province, Iran. By User:Mostafameraji --IamMM 15:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
The CA should be reduced. --Ermell 20:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Mountain Beshtau, Pyatigorsk, Russia. By User:Ganzikov --IamMM 15:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Mellisuga helenae. By User:Touhid biplob --IamMM 15:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Well arranged shot; geocoding and additional information would not go amiss --Virtual-Pano 15:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Moraine lake, Alberta, Canada. By User:Chensiyuan --IamMM 15:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Awsome.--Charlie fong 15:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Sninský kameň, Slovakia. By User:Milan Bališin --IamMM 15:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Ein Briefmarkenblock der ehemaligen DDR. --Nightflyer 12:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sri Lankan sloth bear (Melursus ursinus inornatus) --Charlesjsharp 11:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Sri Lankan sloth bear (Melursus ursinus inornatus) --Charlesjsharp 11:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Sri Lankan sloth bear (Melursus ursinus inornatus) --Charlesjsharp 11:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Sri Lankan sloth bear (Melursus ursinus inornatus) --Charlesjsharp 11:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Sri Lankan spotted deer (Axis axis ceylonensis) male --Charlesjsharp 11:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: A spotted deer (fawn) in Jim Corbett national park, India--Subhrajyoti07 09:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Towers of the church of Banz Monastery, aerial view. --Ermell 09:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Hippos at Cologne Zoo --Ermell 09:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination War memorial at the Himmelkron monastery church --Ermell 09:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: A wild peacock in Jim Corbett national park, India--Subhrajyoti07 09:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Oppose the moment had passed; too hidden --Charlesjsharp 11:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
and needs species and Indian birds categroy --Charlesjsharp 11:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination A spotted deer (Stag)--Subhrajyoti07 09:17, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose too soft and dark --Charlesjsharp 11:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Crested Serpent Eagle in Jim Corbett National Park, India --Subhrajyoti07 08:54, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose too noisy and too blue --Charlesjsharp 11:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Red-wattled lapwing standing on ground --Subhrajyoti07 08:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
please add species category and sort sort of birds of India category --Charlesjsharp 11:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Idukki Reservoir, NE arm viewed from Calvary Mount. Panorama spanning about 12 km. Kerala --Tagooty 08:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment Please add geocode --Imehling 13:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
@Imehling:Done --Tagooty 15:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 16:15, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Idukki Reservoir, NE arm viewed from Calvary Mount. Panorama spanning about 12 km. Kerala --Tagooty 08:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Saint Joseph church in Boisse-Penchot, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 13:20, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Saint Peter church in Naves, commune of Manhac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Stations of the Cross in the Saint Magdalene church in Jamblusse, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 05:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Peter in chains church in Saillagol, Tarn-et-Garonne, France. --Tournasol7 05:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Cross at Place de la Halle in Naves, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination “Memorial for the Victims of National Socialism” (Joachim Berthold, 1964) on Ludwig-Wiesmann-Strasse and Charleville-Mézières-Platz in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Gravesite “Caspar Offenberg” at the Hörster Cemetery in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:35, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Side or riverside path on the Munstersche Aa (between Spiekerhof and Bergstrasse), Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination City model of the old town of the city of Münster, which was destroyed in World War II, at the Überwasserkirche in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:35, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Detail shot of art project “The Cast Whale Project” (Gil Shachar) in the Holy Cross Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination The Queen Wilhelmina Forest. Life path KWF Cancer Control. Glass panel with a poem by Harry Wanders. Title: “I embrace you with my feelings”.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Support Good quality. --XRay 05:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination The Queen Wilhelmina Forest. Life path KWF Cancer Control. Glass panel with a poem by Harry Wanders. Title: “I embrace you with my feelings”.
- Nomination Kalvari Mount (Calvary Mount) sign board, Idukki, Kerala --Tagooty 03:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination looking down on Calvary Mount Church, Idukki Distt, Kerala --Tagooty 03:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Window shutters next to the entrance portal of the villa «Haus Kärnten» on Moosburger Straße #25, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
A bit soft. Possible to sharpen? --Tagooty 03:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. The image was sharpened. It was snowing. So the photo is being softened by the snowfall. —- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. I suggest to add "... snowing ..." in the Summary, CAT. --Tagooty 06:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Sailboats at the trailer park for sailboats next to the Drautalbahn II on 10. Oktober Strasse, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Winterly birch on 10. Oktober Strasse, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Can you add a CAT for the bird perched on the top, and add to the Summary. I find this bird adds to the composition. --Tagooty 03:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. CAT for the bird was added. —- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination View of Maria Wörth from the gazebo at the peninsula, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Salix caprea at the park of the Landscape Protection Area on the peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Black redstart at Nasirpur, Patiala. --Satdeep Gill 02:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality and well categorized --Charlesjsharp 11:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Black redstart at Nasirpur, Patiala. --Satdeep Gill 02:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Useful to add a CAT for the location. --Tagooty 03:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Black redstart at Nasirpur, Patiala. --Satdeep Gill 02:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 11:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Black redstart at Nasirpur, Patiala. --Satdeep Gill 02:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
don't think we need this one --Charlesjsharp 11:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Black redstart at Nasirpur, Patiala. --Satdeep Gill 02:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
don't think we need this one --Charlesjsharp 11:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Ján Novota, Goalkeeper of SK Rapid Wien. --Steindy 00:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Ján Novota, Goalkeeper of SK Rapid Wien. The photo was made acros the place. --Steindy 00:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Ján Novota, Goalkeeper of SK Rapid Wien. --Steindy 00:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 00:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Ján Novota, Goalkeeper of SK Rapid Wien. --Steindy 00:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Ján Novota, Goalkeeper of SK Rapid Wien. --Steindy 00:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 00:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
March 17, 2022[edit]
- Nomination Temporary housing for the earthquake victims in Arkalochori.by User:C messier --Ezarate 23:16, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Suey Sing Chamber of Labor and Commerce in Marysville’s historic Chinatown, 305 1st Street. --Frank Schulenburg 22:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Well composed -- top of flagpole not vital to the image IMO --Virtual-Pano 23:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Study of geological samples. By User:Владимир Андреевич Гурьев --Mike Peel 21:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Istituto Dalle Molle di Studi sull’Intelligenza Artificiale Svizzera - a worker at her office. By User:Marianduven --Mike Peel 21:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Students in the limestone fields, looking for fossils. By User:Peeterpaaver --Mike Peel 21:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: In the framework of the research project "Influence of overgrown reservoirs with higher aquatic plants on flowering processes and fish productivity", young scientists of the Institute of Hydrobiology of the NAS of Ukraine together with a specialist in remote sensing of the Earth conducted research the dissemination water nut (Trapa natans L.) of Kyiv Reservoir by using the Dji mavic pro drone (at a altitude of more than 50 m). By User:Bilousolena --Mike Peel 21:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: The process of complex research of young scientists at the Kyiv and Kaniv reservoirs as part of the research project "The impact of overgrown reservoirs with higher aquatic plants on flowering processes and fish productivity". By User:Bilousolena --Mike Peel 21:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination The theatre in Hof, Germany at night. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 12:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Vorderer Gosausee and Hoher Dachstein by User:FkMohr --Milseburg 17:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Banana inflorescence, Cheruthony, Kerala --Tagooty 16:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Banana flowers tend to be pretty big. Could you possibly sharpen this photo a bit? -- Ikan Kekek 18:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek:Done Please review the new version. --Tagooty 04:06, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Weak support, good at 70%. -- Ikan Kekek 05:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Tea plants with a backdrop of the Western Ghats, Calvary Mount, Kerala --Tagooty 16:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Calvary Mount Church, Narakakanam, Kerala --Tagooty 16:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Calvary Mount Church, Narakakanam, set against the Western Ghats, Kerala --Tagooty 16:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Idukki Reservoir, NE arm towards the dam, from Calvary Mount. Kerala --Tagooty 16:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment Geocode would be helpful. --Imehling 08:33, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
@Imehling:Done --Tagooty 08:55, 19 March 2022 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 11:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Idukki Reservoir, NE arm towards the dam, from Calvary Mount. Kerala --Tagooty 16:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination A spotted deer crossing a road inside Jim Corbett national park, Uttarakhand, India--Subhrajyoti07 15:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination A spotted deer or Chital in Jim Corbett national park looking straight to the camera --Subhrajyoti07 15:43, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support good quality but may I recommend some geo coding as not everyone knows where Jim Corbett National Park is located --Virtual-Pano 16:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment I've added CAT:Axis axis in the Jim Corbett National Park which includes the species and the location. --Tagooty 16:14, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Himalayan mountain range as visible from Uttarakhand, India--Subhrajyoti07 15:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline Great motif, but insufficient quality. Too strong artefacts. --Milseburg 17:43, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Mount Trishul - 1 --Subhrajyoti07 15:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Please add a specific category for this image of "Trishul 1" --Tagooty 16:17, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Comment I've added -Subhrajyoti07 06:53, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Sri Lankan jackals (Canis aureus naria) --Charlesjsharp 12:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 16:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Sri Lankan leopard (Panthera pardus kotiya) female --Charlesjsharp 12:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. I suggest making the summary more descriptive, eg "... climbing down a tree...". And adding a CAT for the location. --Tagooty 16:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Open wing Nectaring of Argynnis hyperbius (Linnaeus, 1763) – Tropical Fritillary (by Sourabh.biswas003) --Atudu 12:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
is this downsized? --Charlesjsharp 12:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Pupa of Acraea issoria (Hübner, 1819) – Yellow Coster (by Sourabh.biswas003) --Atudu 11:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support OK quality for this --Charlesjsharp 11:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Apricot blossom, slightly marred by frost. Unfortunately, with the change in the climate on earth, early flowering of fruit trees occurs, which is then caught by the frost due to the cold and then compromising the fruits. --PROPOLI87 11:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Porta di Terraferma in Zadar, Croatia. --Palauenc05 10:33, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Civil twilight in Kvikkjokk-Kabla fjällurskog (nature reserve in Jokkmokks kommun, Norrbotten County, Sweden) --Trougnouf 10:29, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Epitaph of the Lord of Cremon in the monastery church in Himmelkron --Ermell 10:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:57, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Coat of arms cartouche in Himmelkron Monastery Church --Ermell 10:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Reading woman on a stream.
--F. Riedelio 09:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:43, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Reading woman on a stream.
- Nomination: Street artists on the market in Santanyí (Majorca)
--F. Riedelio 09:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC) - Review
There are some CAs on the chairs. --Steindy 20:43, 17 March 2022 (UTC)New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 10:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Street artists on the market in Santanyí (Majorca)
- Nomination Numbered beach baskets (North Sea form) in Goting on the island Föhr
--F. Riedelio 09:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Numbered beach baskets (North Sea form) in Goting on the island Föhr
- Nomination Doner kebab shop on a federal highway
--F. Riedelio 09:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:11, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Doner kebab shop on a federal highway
- Nomination Swedish fire with sparks flying
--F. Riedelio 09:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:11, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Swedish fire with sparks flying
- Nomination 63 Didi Dmanisi-Dmanisi-Gomareti-Bediani, Dmanisi Pentecostal Church in GeorgiaI --Reda Kerbouche 08:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:56, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Padlocks in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:37, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Padlock in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:37, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice composition, good quality, and I wish the two lovers a long and happy relationship. -- Ikan Kekek 07:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Palácio Nacional da Pena - Arco Triunfal / Sintra, Portugal --Imehling 06:52, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
dead pixel just above the leftmost merlon ; could do with a bit of shadow boosting --Virtual-Pano 16:00, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Done --Imehling 08:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Swelling leaf bud of a sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa). Focus stack of 37 photos.
--Famberhorst 06:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Swelling leaf bud of a sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa). Focus stack of 37 photos.
- Nomination Shell of an Ancillariid, Ancilla ventricosa fulva --Llez 05:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Kampen, Sculpture " The Lantern Bearer " Artwork by Thomas Rodr.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 17 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Kampen, Sculpture " The Lantern Bearer " Artwork by Thomas Rodr.
- Nomination Castle of Combret in commune of Nauviale, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Part of southern facade of the Saint James church in Puylagarde, Tarn-et-Garonne, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Stained-glass window in the St Peter church in Rignac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Saint Amans church in Camboulazet, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination St Antoninus church in Combret, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Black-winged Stilt near Jalalpur, Patiala. --Satdeep Gill 04:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality though unfortunate background --Charlesjsharp 11:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Black-winged Stilt near Jalalpur, Patiala. --Satdeep Gill 04:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality though unfortunate background --Charlesjsharp 11:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Black-winged Stilt near Jalalpur, Patiala. --Satdeep Gill 04:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 11:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Western yellow wagtail near Jalalpur, Patiala. --Satdeep Gill 04:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Western yellow wagtail near Jalalpur, Patiala. --Satdeep Gill 04:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination “Memorial for the Victims of National Socialism” (Joachim Berthold, 1964) on Ludwig-Wiesmann-Strasse and Charleville-Mézières-Platz in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Gravesite “Christoph Bernhard Schlueter” at the Hörster Cemetery in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Detail of the sculpture “Spiekerhofgänse” (Arnold Schlick, 1950) at the Aa Bridge at the Spiekerhof in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality but background should be more blurred --Charlesjsharp 11:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Tower of the former observatory (Johannisstrasse) in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Art project “The Cast Whale Project” (Gil Shachar) in the Holy Cross Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Sumas Mountain. --The Cosmonaut 02:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:39, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination St. George's Anglican Church. --The Cosmonaut 02:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Ernst Baumeister, manager of FC Admira Wacker Mödling. --Steindy 00:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
can you recrop below fingers? Is this downsized? --Charlesjsharp 11:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
No, I can not and it is not downsized, it is a snippet. And it's so sharp you can even tell the time. But that's not your concern, you have fun bashing my photos. --Steindy 21:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Carsten Janker, assistent coach of SK Rapid Wien. --Steindy 00:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
can you recrop including both arms? Is this downsized? --Charlesjsharp 11:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
No, I can not and it is not downsized, it is a snippet. But that's not your concern, you have fun bashing my photos. --Steindy 21:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Carsten Janker, assistent coach of SK Rapid Wien. --Steindy 00:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
downsized? --Charlesjsharp 11:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
It is not downsized, it is a snippet. But that's not your concern, you have fun bashing my photos. --Steindy 21:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC) This one is definitely ok --Imehling 09:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Support I agree this one is fine. I asked whether these images had been downsized as it is a strange artistic decision to crop off fingers etc if you have them in the image in the first place! Charlesjsharp 11:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Ján Novota, Goalkeeper of SK Rapid Wien. --Steindy 00:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
March 16, 2022[edit]
- Nomination: Stateroom aboard a Qatar Executive Gulfstream G650 at EBACE 2019 --MB-one 22:58, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: BMW 3.0 CSL at Techno Classica 2018, Essen --MB-one 22:58, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: 3rd generation Mercedes-Benz Tourismo --MB-one 22:58, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Head of central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) --Virtual-Pano 22:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment there's a hint of CA on the left egde of the head. --MB-one 22:58, 16 March 2022 (UTC))
Done --Virtual-Pano 11:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality now --MB-one 17:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Head of central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) --Virtual-Pano 22:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Dead tree at the entrance of Tenerife Espacio de las Artes, Santa Cruz de Tenerife --Mike Peel 21:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Palacio Insular de Tenerife, wrapped up, with flags flying. Santa Cruz de Tenerife. --Mike Peel 21:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Epitaph in the monastery church of Himmelkron --Ermell 09:43, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:05, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Maryland State Police AW139 Trooper 3 conducting hoist exercises --Acroterion 02:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
OK to crop bladers, but why crop car too? --Charlesjsharp 10:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC) I have looser crops, but found the composition with those crops to be uncompelling. I'll see if there is one that I can re-crop in lieu of this one. Acroterion 12:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Maryland State Police AW139 Trooper 3 conducting hoist exercises --Acroterion 02:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Oppose very tight crop, processing flaws (halo round man
and treeline to the left) --Virtual-Pano 10:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC) Wider crops tend to make the men on the hoist incidental to the image. I'll lookat correcting the artifacts. Acroterion 12:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC) I can't find a halo around the man, but the distortion of the trees on the left is the helicopter's hot exhaust stream distorting the air. Acroterion 01:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Sorrry I did not realize it is exhaust down wash (corrected above) -- halo around man (sharpening result?) is already visible in thumb view --Virtual-Pano 18:14, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Robert Schörgenhofer, football referee of Austria. --Steindy 00:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
very tightly cropped to the right, are you able to fix that? --Virtual-Pano 16:09, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
I don't just take photos for Wikipaedia. The photo is therefore deliberately designed so that you can insert a title or text on the left side if you wish. If you don't need this, you can still select the image section as you need it. --Steindy 23:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
March 15, 2022[edit]
- Nomination Geometric mosaic floor with a bust of the season in the middle panel (130-138 AD) - Palazzo Massimo alle Terme Rome Italy. by User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT --Ezarate 23:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
rotation of image left blank spaces, see blue lines below and to the right of mosaic --Virtual-Pano 09:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC))
done --Ezarate 22:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:57, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Carpocoris mediterraneus ssp. atlanticus in Ávila, Spain. --Balles2601 21:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Junior Jumper 07:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Norway Maple leaves with autumn colours
--F. Riedelio 16:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Norway Maple leaves with autumn colours
- Nomination: Saint Maurice window in cathedral Fribourg --Matutinho 15:35, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Saint Sebastian window in cathedral Fribourg --Matutinho 15:35, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Bird on wooden pole Wiki Loves Earth 2019. By User:Levva28 --EconAmbiente 14:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Swimming at the beach of Durrës on a sunny afternoon in November. By User:Albinfo --EconAmbiente 14:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline Nice view, but it has the overprocessed look and the lack of details which is typical for samartphone photos --Imehling 07:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Panoramic view from Cape of Rodon and Gjiri i Lalzit. By User:Ardycc --EconAmbiente 14:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose lacks detail --MB-one 19:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: October at the beach in Durrës, Albania. By User:Albinfo --EconAmbiente 14:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Wooden footbridge Wiki Loves Earth 2019. By User:Levva28 --EconAmbiente 14:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The bridge is blur --Junior Jumper 07:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Villa de l'Etoile, Avenue de l'Hippodrome 216, Lambersart, France --Velvet 11:30, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Portal of the entrance to the cemetery of the Saint-Michel church in Horbourg-Wihr (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 09:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Visiblechromatic aberration should be removed. --F. Riedelio 08:00, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: St. Michael's Church in Horbourg-Wihr (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 09:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Visible violettchromatic aberration on upper left tree; the door is too dark (fixable?) --F. Riedelio 11:20, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Fish ponds in the Aufseß valley near Wüstenstein --Ermell 09:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
IMO not sharp enough for QI. --F. Riedelio 07:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
March 14, 2022[edit]
- Nomination Ageratum conyzoides at Ranjit Sagar Lake near Pathankot. --Satdeep Gill 14:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry: insufficient
DoF (the back part of the flower is blurred)
--F. Riedelio 11:17, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Entrance door of a gymnasium in northeastern France. --Mathieu Kappler 14:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Please check the verticals. --Ermell 11:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Entrance door of a gymnasium in northeastern France. --Mathieu Kappler 14:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Entrance door of a gymnasium in northeastern France. --Mathieu Kappler 14:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
perspective correction needed plus unbalanced crop --MB-one 18:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Entrance door of a gymnasium in northeastern France. --Mathieu Kappler 14:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Sri Lankan elephants (Elephas maximus maximus) --Charlesjsharp 11:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Our Lady basilica in Ceignac, commune of Calmont, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Good but there's a bit of CA on the tree --Trougnouf 23:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
March 13, 2022[edit]
- Nomination Green bee-eater in Patiala, India. --Satdeep Gill 17:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
nice and sharp, but too small if cropped as it should be --Charlesjsharp 20:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
I think it's sharp enough when zoomed in but there is then too much background noise. Can you clean the background? --Trougnouf 17:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Done @Trougnouf: --Satdeep Gill 07:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 09:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Country road with metal silos --aismallard 15:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective distortionperspective distortion, correction is needed (horizon tilt to the right). --F. Riedelio 09:57, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Hill in Central Park with wall --aismallard 15:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
It needs a perspective correction. Idk if it'd be a QI then; the composition is a bit chaotic such that I don't see the focus and none of the trees are identified. The sharpness is not particularly good so it would work better if there was a specific subject in focus. --Trougnouf 16:58, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Double rainbow by refraction of sunlight in the raindrops
--F. Riedelio 15:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Needs a perspective correction. The contrasts / saturation may have been pushed a little bit too far to highlight the rainbows? --Trougnouf 16:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 08:14, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
It's better but the perspective is still off. It needs approximately 0.93 degrees clockwise rotation and 0.151 vertical lens shift for the vertical lines to be straight. --Trougnouf 09:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)New version Next try, thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 16:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Much better, thanks. --Trougnouf 19:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Double rainbow by refraction of sunlight in the raindrops
- Nomination "Cyclist" painted fire hydrant of Barlow Avenue and Vaughan Street in Quesnel, BC --Trougnouf 14:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
IMO unfavorable cropping, portrait format would be better (fixable?). --F. Riedelio 10:03, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Done, how is that? --Trougnouf 11:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 07:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
March 12, 2022[edit]
- Nomination Alternative clock at Maker Faire Berlin 2018, FEZ Wuhlheide --MB-one 13:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Good quality. Please add a description of the subject in the Summary. --Tagooty 16:28, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
@MB-one: --Tagooty 08:18, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Done --MB-one 17:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:50, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: The roof and spire of a church tower in northeastern France. --Mathieu Kappler 07:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
QI to me if you reduce the vignetting --Poco a poco 08:02, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: The abat-sons of a church in northeastern France. --Mathieu Kappler 07:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective distortionperspective distortion, correction is needed. --F. Riedelio 16:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: The abat-sons and clockface on a church tower in northeastern France. --Mathieu Kappler 07:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Clockface on a church tower in northeastern France. --Mathieu Kappler 07:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective distortionperspective distortion, correction is needed. --F. Riedelio 09:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Lower part of a church door in northeastern France. --Mathieu Kappler 07:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline DoF too shallow. Lower lip out of focus --MB-one 18:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Interior of Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica, Montreal, Canada.. By User:Wilfredor --IamMM 07:20, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Noise level acceptable but there is some ccw tilt --Poco a poco 07:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Govt Engg College, Idukki, Kerala --Tagooty 06:24, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
The paths of the overhead lines are very puzzling. Looks very much like a post-processing error. --Ermell 10:20, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
@Ermell: The only transformative post-processing done is a very small rotation. Idukki is one of the major hydel projects in Kerala, the area is criss-crossed with high tension and low tension power lines. --Tagooty 03:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
March 11, 2022[edit]
- Nomination: Roundabout and street features in Remiremont, northeastern France. --Mathieu Kappler 23:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment Tilted to the left. --Imehling 12:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Roundabout and street features in Remiremont, northeastern France. --Mathieu Kappler 23:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: A gymnasium in Remiremont, eastern France. --Mathieu Kappler 23:20, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment Needs perspective correction. --Imehling 12:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: A gymnasium in Remiremont, eastern France. --Mathieu Kappler 23:20, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: A stone and wood house - Main door --Terragio67 21:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Maybe close, but not a QI. --Terragio67 13:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: A stone and wood house - Main door --Terragio67 21:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Reinhold Ranftl, player of LASK Linz. --Steindy 00:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Light is not good. Fixable?--Lmbuga 14:28, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment @Lmbuga: Can you tell me please what's wrong. So I don't know what you mean. --Steindy 22:10, 11 March 2022 (UTC) Looks ok to me. --Imehling 12:34, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Can't spot anything wrong either --Virtual-Pano 21:15, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
March 9, 2022[edit]
March 8, 2022[edit]
- Nomination: "The Watch Seller" (2014) bronze statue by Rhonda Weppler and Trevor Mahovsky in Vancouver, BC --Trougnouf 19:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
IMO unfavorable image cropping (the many people do not contribute to the image expression). --F. Riedelio 16:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
That's subjective, I think they are crucial to the scene. --Trougnouf 20:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
March 7, 2022[edit]
- Nomination: Beer truck, St. Gallen --MB-one 20:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective distortionperspective distortion (building in the background), too hazy (less contrast), fixable? --F. Riedelio 15:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Done --MB-one 18:17, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination: Novocherkassk. Alexander Nevsky Church --Alexxx1979 09:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective correction seems to be a bit too much.The outer verticals are leaning inwards near the bottom. --Zinnmann 11:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
Rules
These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.
- To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
- You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
- The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
- Using
{{support}}
or{{oppose}}
will make it easier to count your vote. - Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
- In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
- Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add
Oppose and
Support if necessary.
- Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
- Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".
Consensual Review[edit]
File:Sri_Lankan_leopard_(Panthera_pardus_kotiya)_male.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Sri Lankan leopard (Panthera pardus kotiya) male --Charlesjsharp 12:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose The lighting is poor. The leopard is largely obscured by bushes. The CAT should be "Category:Panthera pardus in Yala National Park". This CAT has several better, high res images. --Tagooty 02:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Citroen_C-Elysee,_Zadar_(P1080811).jpg[edit]
- Nomination Citroen C-Elysée in Zadar, Croatia --MB-one 13:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Discussion
Needs a slight perspective correction (the window bars on the bottom right should probably be vertical) --Trougnouf 22:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Done --MB-one 18:53, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 19:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose IMHO with half the car in shade, the composition is not QI. --GRDN711 23:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose per GRDN711. --Fischer.H 10:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
File:20181208_JMSDF_Lockheed_P-3_Orion_landing_Naha_Air_Show_2018-47.jpg[edit]
- Nomination A JMSDF P-3 Orion landing at the Naha Airport. --Balon Greyjoy 08:37, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 16:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Appears under-exposed to me but open to other opinions in CR. --GRDN711 23:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Sri_Lankan_leopard_(Panthera_pardus_kotiya)_female_5.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Sri Lankan leopard (Panthera pardus kotiya) female --Charlesjsharp 12:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
This was a comment for the wrong photo, sorry!Oppose I disagree. There is too much covered of the Leopard for my taste. Let's see what other users say. --Steindy 22:17, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Are you serious, Steindy? Very little of the view of the leopard is blocked. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:47, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Sri_Lankan_leopard_(Panthera_pardus_kotiya)_female_3.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Sri Lankan leopard (Panthera pardus kotiya) female --Charlesjsharp 12:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree. There is too much covered of the Leopard for my taste. Let's see what other users say. --Steindy 22:17, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Support The only thing that really matters is that we see her face, though we also see her tail, etc. I don't get voting against this. What a look from her! -- Ikan Kekek 05:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Revenge vote from Steindy who has no understanding how challenging this sort of image is. Unfortunately, leopard do not prowl on the football pitches of Austria. Charlesjsharp 11:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Very good for such challenging photo. --Nefronus 10:18, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
File:002_2015_04_23_Feuerwehr_und_Feuerwehrbedarf.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Historical fire engine from Ahrens-Fox (USA, Cincinnati, Ohio)
--F. Riedelio 16:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC) - Discussion
Oppose tire cropped --Charlesjsharp 10:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Support I disagree! Outstanding photo. Everyone can imagine what the rest of the tire looks like. --Steindy 21:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Yeah, fine picture to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
File:08277_-_Adult_Brown_booby_in_flight_-_(sula_leucogaster_leucogaster).jpg[edit]
- Nomination Adult brown booby in flight [sula leucogaster leucogaster] scanning the sea for preyI --Virtual-Pano 22:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Very noisy. --Junior Jumper 13:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment Let's get other opinions --Virtual-Pano 13:24, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment A good large image. Noisy, but I think that NR will correct the problem. --Tagooty 16:12, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Done new version uploaded, thanks for pointing the flaw out --Virtual-Pano 20:51, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Support A bit soft but given the large resolution of the image, it is ok for QI. --Tagooty 02:05, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Overprocessed by denoising. --Smial 10:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment completly reprocessed file uploaded --Virtual-Pano 13:56, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment The reprocessed file is good, I continue my support! --Tagooty 03:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose These kinds of photos are hard, but nothing is sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 05:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
File:At_Orient_Point,_Long_Island_2018_13.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Cape Henlopen, off Orient Point, Suffolk County --Mike Peel 22:27, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Sorry: not sharp enough for QI, horizon tilt to the right, disturbing dolphins. --F. Riedelio 09:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
@F. Riedelio: Would you mind elaborating please? I've tweaked the horizon - but only by 0.2°, there's land on the right. Which parts aren't sharp? Where are the dolphins? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: The horizon is straight now. The right third of the image is blurred (cars). The dolphins are in the foreground. --F. Riedelio 08:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, I hadn't heard that use of the word 'dolphin' before, was looking at the water to see if I'd missed the animals somehow! It looks sufficiently sharp to me? But if not, fair enough. Thanks. Mike Peel 17:15, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: The horizon is straight now. The right third of the image is blurred (cars). The dolphins are in the foreground. --F. Riedelio 08:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose per F. Riedelio. --Fischer.H 10:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
File:At_La_Palma_2021_1793.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Eclectus roratus in La Palma --Mike Peel 21:17, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:21, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
borderline; focus has missed the eye --Charlesjsharp 10:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC) Support Regardig the resolution which allows prints in A3 size or larger without sharpness issues the image is by far good enough as QI. Composition probably not absolutely perfect, but very nice lighting, colours appear realistic. --Smial 09:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Looks under-exposed with low depth of field. --GRDN711 01:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Hamburg,Wikipedia_Ahoi,_Barkassenfahrt_NIK_6834.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Ein Schubschiff mit absenkbarem Steuerhaus. --Nightflyer 19:15, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose It needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 20:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Different previews at the same time, so to CR --Michielverbeek 22:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Comment Sorry, that are one photo. Please mark the QR. Gruss --Nightflyer 22:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Comment @Michielverbeek: Gruss --Nightflyer 11:15, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry! I think the choice of subject is bad. It could certainly have been avoided that the cranes were cut off on the left and right. Also, I don't think the coordinates are correct. --Steindy 14:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
@Steindy: Take an look on this picture (for Coordinates). Gruss --Nightflyer 18:38, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Oppose per Michielverbeek. --Trougnouf 14:56, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
@Trougnouf: Please mark the QR. Gruss --Nightflyer 18:38, 17 March 2022 (UTC)